<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensitivity to Microwaves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosenlawoffice.com/sensitivity-to-microwaves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosenlawoffice.com/sensitivity-to-microwaves/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charyl Zehfus</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenlawoffice.com/sensitivity-to-microwaves/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Charyl Zehfus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosenlawoffice.com/?p=269#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Your link that says &quot;scientific literature does not support such a link&quot; goes to Wikipedia, NOT a reliable source. The article on this topic is clearly biased.
To balance this bias, take a look at
:
BioInitiative Report 
http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/editors/what.htm
http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/report/docs/report.pdf 
AND
Bibliography of about 2300 documents reporting biological phenomena (&quot;effects&quot;) and clinical manifestations attributed to microwave and radio-requency radiation. Glaser, Z.R. 1972. 
http://smartmetersafetydotcom.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/naval-medical-research-inst-studies-on-rf-health-hazards.pdf
Full document available here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/10955212/Evidence-Against-Cell-Phones-The-Glaser-List</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link that says &#8220;scientific literature does not support such a link&#8221; goes to Wikipedia, NOT a reliable source. The article on this topic is clearly biased.<br />
To balance this bias, take a look at<br />
:<br />
BioInitiative Report<br />
<a href="http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/editors/what.htm" rel="nofollow">http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/editors/what.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/report/docs/report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/report/docs/report.pdf</a><br />
AND<br />
Bibliography of about 2300 documents reporting biological phenomena (&#8220;effects&#8221;) and clinical manifestations attributed to microwave and radio-requency radiation. Glaser, Z.R. 1972.<br />
<a href="http://smartmetersafetydotcom.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/naval-medical-research-inst-studies-on-rf-health-hazards.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://smartmetersafetydotcom.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/naval-medical-research-inst-studies-on-rf-health-hazards.pdf</a><br />
Full document available here:<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/10955212/Evidence-Against-Cell-Phones-The-Glaser-List" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/10955212/Evidence-Against-Cell-Phones-The-Glaser-List</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

